How does interceptor missile work

Second, he added, is about the morale of the nation in not being intimidated by rockets. Chopra said Israel, along with the US and Russia, is the leader. While India is continent-sized, Israel is smaller and has to deal with threats that are relatively close around it. But they have much longer range. S has to cater to shooting down missiles, aircraft in some to km range. India and Israel have significant cooperation in missiles, including the Baraak At the moment, India has Akash short-range surface-to-air missiles, and Russian systems including Pechora.

Click here to join our channel indianexpress and stay updated with the latest headlines. Krishn Kaushik Coronavirus Explained.

Once a launch is detected by a satellite, the missile tracking is transferred to forward deployed RADAR systems. The boost phase is when the missile is most visible to the BMD system. The warhead trajectory is monitored and broadcasted to the entire BMD network. The midcourse phase is the longest portion of the missile flight profile.

The BMD system transitions to close-in warhead tracking as the warhead enters the terminal phase. The CEP can grow through the entire missile flight phase depending on missile system performance at various stages of flight. Some midcourse tracking systems can be used for terminal tracking of warheads. The United States has four options for addressing missile threats in the midcourse and terminal phase.

Defeating a ballistic missile threat is akin to shooting a bullet travelling at 15, miles per hour with another bullet. Typically, decoys are released along with the warhead to confuse the tracking RADAR tracking or interceptor systems.

Warheads can also use infrared countermeasures. These tactics used by adversaries makes the job of the BMD even more complicated. The most reliable defense against ballistic missile attack is the United States Aegis Ballistic Defense.

The Aegis system is also available in land based systems. However, ignoring the failing test record of the GMD system, it would be very expensive, dangerous, and destabilizing to build the hundreds or thousands of interceptors necessary to counter Chinese and Russian nuclear forces.

The defense would then rationally respond by building more interceptors, yet again causing the offensive country to build more missiles. The cycle then continues endlessly. This type of arms race is dangerous on its own, but it is also illogical for the defense. Offensive missiles are much cheaper and easier to build than interceptors, always giving the advantage to the offense. This hypothetical scenario also assumes that one interceptor can confidently knock down an incoming nuclear weapon, which it cannot.

Unfortunately, President George W. Bush withdrew from the treaty in