What is the difference between creatine monohydrate and creapure

Research has discovered that creatine is the most effective supplement for high-intensity training, explosive activities, weight lifting, sprinting, football, baseball, and other sports that require short bursts of energy [ 1 ].

The adult human body has 80— grams of creatine, which is just half of what we need, and spends between two and four grams per day with regular activity. Since high-intensity training requires higher creatine intake, we need to consume it in the form of a dietary supplement. Even though creatine supplementation can't be more different than energy drinks, it still gives you enough energy to sustain more reps. After taking the planned creatine content, every time your muscle cells contract during a workout, they lose a phosphate and transform into ADP Adeno-diphosphate.

ATP is the energy currency stored in your muscle cells, which is also the only acceptable energy currency for the body. There are a couple of types of creatine available on the market, and some are even marketed with bold claims not supported by research. Creatine monohydrate is the oldest, most studied and used form of creatine.

Hundreds of studies support its effectiveness and safety. The technical process of making this specific creatine monohydrate is what makes it purer compared to other types of creatine. While most creatine supplements on the market have The advantages of taking Creapure over the traditional creatine monohydrate are more than apparent.

Still, Creapure is way more expensive than regular creatine monohydrate because of the additional purifying processes it goes through. Many professional athletes, myself included, believe it's worth it and are willing to pay extra for the difference that 0.

Its pharmaceutical and toxicological properties are still unknown, but researchers discovered that it's structurally similar to compounds that have shown to have carcinogenic properties. Creatine Ethyl Ester CEE is very popular because, unlike other creatine supplements, it's easy on the stomach.

It doesn't cause the most common side effects, but researchers have discovered that it's neither better nor worse than regular monohydrate. Additionally, total body mass, fat mass, fat-free mass, and thigh muscle mass were not significantly enhanced with creatine ethyl ester supplementation compared to placebo or creatine monohydrate groups.

CEE is also popular because it can be taken in smaller doses than regular monohydrate, delivering the same results. HCL is known for its superior solubility in water compared. Due to this, it can be used in lower doses 1. Buffered creatine , or kre-alkalyn, is a blend of regular monohydrate creatine and alkaline powder.

It increases your power and reduces side effects such as bloating. Even though popular, liquid creatine is less effective than other forms because creatine breaks down if sitting in liquid for several days. Creatine magnesium chelate is essentially a monohydrate with an attached magnesium molecule.

It's as effective as other forms, but not better. However, cooking and food preparation can result in creatine loss in food. Given your daily requirement of creatine, consumption of meat and synthesis of creatine by your own body may only provide maintenance levels of creatine.

You can personalize the rate within the range provided based on your size, muscle mass and activity level. A loading phase is not required. Want to become a certified personal trainer?

Dear Dr. Which one do you recommend taking? Is there any reason to pick one over the other? If you are confused on nutrition products, you are far from alone! How do you know if one product is superior to another? But for someone who wants to keep his definition up all year round, I would suggest to use CEE, because it is the most soluble and absorbent creatine yet, and it is even more effective than regular monohydrate.

Note, creatine will lose its effectiveness during cutting, and will not put on any muscle. It will only serve as a supplement to give you energy pre-workout, so it is not necessary to take creatine post-workout during cutting phases.

As a result, one doesn't need to use creatine during cutting, but it can help to a lesser extent. Is creatine getting better as technology is getting better, or is nothing better than the original? In my opinion, there are some advancements in creatine that have been extremely effective to improve it.

An example of this is CEE, which I believe is the most effective form of creatine currently out there. This makes it much more effective. However, there have also been advancements that are useless and create products that are less effective than monohydrate.

Unfortunately, these new creatines have just been scams by companies to make a new creatine and call it a breakthrough. An example of these advancements is the creatine serum, which is useless. If it hasn't been made within the same month, the chances of it being pure creatine instead of creatinine are very low.

The original still has its uses and advantages, such as being cheap, available, and most reliable form. I believe the disadvantages such as the bloating effect, the low amount of responders, and the stomach pains and diarrhea outweigh the advantages. I believe micronized creatine should now be considered the original, because it is essentially pure monohydrate, but broken into smaller molecules to increase surface area and therefore absorption.

I believe that the best form of creatine is CEE, and more and better forms will eventually come out. We must learn to differentiate between company scam forms such as the serum, and high quality, increasingly effective products such as CEE and micronized creatine. More of these will be created by technology; we just have to spot them! The future will surely bring is more stunningly effective products, each more effective than before.

I believe we will see a change in trends from combining molecules to creatine, to more effective creatines with added chemicals into the powder which allow the muscle to utilize more of the creatine, and increase its capacity to handle creatine.

We may even see new forms of creatine such as trans-dermal gels, injections Only the future can tell, but what's for sure is it will keep getting better! Creatine is currently the most popular and most commonly used sports supplement. However, all you find in the media, the magazines, and on television are people speaking about creatine who are grossly misinformed. I am here to shed some light on the subject of creatine and its many new forms and the one dinosaur that you won't find in any museums, creatine monohydrate.

Many people know of creatine, and what it is used for, but many actually lack the knowledge of what creatine really is. It is the result of a combination of three amino acids methionine, glycine, and arginine. Creatine, short for methyl guanidine acetic acid, can be found in your own body Creatine phosphate will be further discussed later on in this article. Many foods that can be found in your local supermarket, such as beef and salmon, are high in creatine, but the creatine that can be gained from pounds of those foods can be found in as little as one scoop of creatine.

Adenosine triphosphate, or ATP, is basically the "power" behind your muscles i. Creatine's primary use is for the re-synthesis, or re-storage, of the muscles ATP.

The science behind this is complicated, but basically, when you lift weights, you contract your muscles, which requires the bonds that are found in ATP to split, leaving you with adenosine diphospate, or ADP. When this bond is broken, the cell is given power and the contraction occurs. When the cells entire build up of ATP has been called upon, however, that cell cannot contract any longer. Then, the body must rebuild its stores of ATP, and there are several ways this can be done.

However, we are only concerned with the use of creatine phosphate, which also happens to be the fastest way, without the use of oxygen. When creatine phosphate is split, it yields the "phosphate" part of the molecule. Thus, supplementation with creatine, and further creatine phosphate, allows for quicker regeneration of the ATP within the cells. More simply, creatine enhances your output when lifting weights. As I said, creatine phosphate is used to replenish the bodies stores ATP, and increase the amount of creatine that is found in the muscle.

However, the body's actual level of natural creatine and creatine phosphate is well below that of which it can actually hold. Thus, increasing the level of creatine intake means that you can reach your body's "maximum holding level" of creatine phosphate. Also, it appears that when one supplements with creatine, the ability for the muscle to hold glycogen is enhanced. Glycogen is an intramuscular found inside the muscles carbohydrate that fuels anaerobic activities that the cardiopulmonary system cannot, i.

Many studies have shown that increasing glycogen stores leads to added recovery and muscle hypertrophy, or muscle growth. Therefore, because glycogen requires added water to enter into the cell, it leads to added muscle mass and fuller muscles. Simply put, yes, each and every creatine is different. There are many different forms of creatine, from creatine monohydrate to creatine ethyl ester to creatine orotate. The following is a look into each of the common types of creatines:.

Those esters are formed by a process known as esterification, which is the reaction of carboxylic acids and alcohols. Creatine monohydrate has many studies that show that it increases the overall muscle mass of your body, however, the uptake of regular monohydrate is very poor. As I said, CEE is monohydrate with an extra ester Basically, it means that it has all of the same benefits of monohydrate, but the dosage requirements are lower, there is no loading phase, increased absorption, and that the "creatine bloat" will be no more.